Robotics paper index
Think in 360°: Benchmarking and Bootstrapping Panoramic Video Reasoning
One-line summary
A robotics research paper on Think in 360°: Benchmarking and Bootstrapping Panoramic Video Reasoning.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
A panoramic video captures all directions around the camera, but relevant evidence can appear in different directions and at different times. Understanding it requires models to connect observations across the viewing sphere and time. We introduce PanoVideoBench, the first manually annotated benchmark for comprehensive panoramic video understanding. Its 1,000 questions span five categories and 15 question types, with diagnostic annotations for target search and panoramic capabilities. Evaluation of 11 proprietary, open-source, and panoramic-specialized models identifies cross-view tracking and sphere-time evidence integration as their weakest capabilities. To strengthen these capabilities, we construct PanoVideoCoT, the first reasoning dataset grounded in real panoramic video, through sphere-time-grounded synthesis that converts verified panoramic observations and successful agentic explorations into 13,465 QA-CoT pairs. Starting from a general video MLLM, PanoVideoReasoner learns from this corpus through Panoramic CoT SFT and Evidence-Privileged On-Policy Self-Distillation, a panoramic instantiation of Vision-OPD's OPSD in which the teacher uses verified perspective views to guide student-generated trajectories. It reaches 55.7% on PanoVideoBench, improving the backbone by 12.5 points and the previous SOTA by 2.6. The gains concentrate on the same spatial, cross-view, and temporal capabilities exposed by the benchmark, showing that grounded sphere-time supervision can equip a general video MLLM with panoramic reasoning.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments